| Rang | Team | Sp | S | U | N | T+ | T- | Diff | Pkt | Letzte 6 | PPS | oG% | nTg% | BTTS% | Ü 2.5% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chongqing Tongliang Long | 7 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 15 | 6 | 9 | 19 | WWWWWW | 2.71 | 28.6% | 0.0% | 71.4% | 71.4% |
| 2 | Liaoning Shenyang | 7 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 20 | 6 | 14 | 18 | LWWWWW | 2.57 | 28.6% | 0.0% | 71.4% | 85.7% |
| 3 | Guangzhou E-Power | 7 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 14 | 5 | 9 | 16 | WDLWWW | 2.29 | 42.9% | 14.3% | 42.9% | 42.9% |
| 4 | Hebei Kungfu | 7 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 11 | 5 | 6 | 14 | WWWDWL | 2.0 | 57.1% | 0.0% | 42.9% | 28.6% |
| 5 | Suzhou Dongwu | 7 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 7 | 1 | 6 | 13 | WDDDWW | 1.86 | 85.7% | 42.9% | 14.3% | 0.0% |
| 6 | Dalian Huayi | 7 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 7 | 8 | -1 | 9 | LDDLDW | 1.29 | 28.6% | 42.9% | 57.1% | 42.9% |
| 7 | Shenzhen Juniors | 7 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 10 | 17 | -7 | 9 | LLWLLW | 1.29 | 14.3% | 28.6% | 57.1% | 71.4% |
| 8 | Shanghai Jiading | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 7 | -2 | 8 | WLDWLD | 1.14 | 28.6% | 57.1% | 28.6% | 14.3% |
| 9 | Nantong Zhiyun | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 9 | -3 | 8 | LDWLDL | 1.14 | 42.9% | 42.9% | 28.6% | 14.3% |
| 10 | Yanbian Longding | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 11 | -5 | 8 | DLLWWD | 1.14 | 28.6% | 42.9% | 42.9% | 42.9% |
| 11 | Heilongjiang Lava Spring | 7 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 8 | 10 | -2 | 7 | LDWDDL | 1.0 | 28.6% | 14.3% | 71.4% | 57.1% |
| 12 | Nanjing City | 7 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 7 | 9 | -2 | 6 | WDDDLL | 0.86 | 28.6% | 28.6% | 57.1% | 28.6% |
| 13 | Shaanxi Union | 7 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 7 | 9 | -2 | 5 | WLLDLL | 0.71 | 14.3% | 28.6% | 71.4% | 57.1% |
| 14 | Foshan Nanshi | 7 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 10 | -6 | 5 | LWLDLD | 0.71 | 14.3% | 57.1% | 42.9% | 28.6% |
| 15 | Qingdao Red Lions | 7 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 9 | -5 | 4 | DDLLLD | 0.57 | 14.3% | 42.9% | 57.1% | 14.3% |
| 16 | Guangxi Baoyun | 7 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 13 | -9 | 2 | LDLLDL | 0.29 | 14.3% | 57.1% | 42.9% | 57.1% |