Aldershot Town 2-0 Boreham Wood — Result, Statistics & Match Review — England - FA Cup, 1 Feb 2025

📅01/02/2025 · 🕒18:00 Istanbul · GMT+3
Top 2 Score Predictions
1st Score 2-1 2nd Score 2-2
MODEL iddaakolik · Our Predictions
Authentic Intelligence™ · Probability per market
⏱ Odds and predictions are pre-match — updates freeze from ~20 minutes before kick-off.
Match Result
Home
37%
3.17
Draw
27%
3.54
Away
36%
1.96
Under/Over 2.5
Under
49%
2.15
Over Pick
51%
1.69
Both Teams to Score
Yes
51%
1.57
No
49%
2.24
Total Goals
0-1
25%
2-3
42%
4-5
22%
6+
11%
Half Time / Full Time
1/1
19%
1/2
4%
1/X
6%
X/1
8%
X/2
10%
X/X
13%
2/1
10%
2/2
22%
2/X
8%
STRENGTH — green bars inside a box show the pattern support behind that selection, from Good · Strong · Very strong to Great — the deeper the historical record, the fuller the bar; informational, not a sized bet.
Our Pick = the most likely outcome, not a value bet.
PREVIEW Match Preview Engine
iddaakolik model signals — not real match figures
HOME Aldershot Town The Market 32%
Head to Head
AWAY Boreham Wood The Market 51%
Average Season vs Marketall history · vs bookmaker expectation Average
Average Recent Form vs Marketlatest matches · vs bookmaker expectation Average
Expected Goals Scoredper match · higher is better
Expected Goals Concededper match · lower is better
Attackvs comparable teams
Defensevs comparable teams
50% Ball Possession 50%
10 Total Shots 10
4 Shots on Target 4
5 Corners 4
92 · 91% PassesSuccessful · Accuracy 128 · 83%
Box TouchesOpposition Penalty Area
Crosses
Yellow Cards
H2H Past Meetings
Real recorded figures, averaged over these meetings
HOME Aldershot Town
3W-0D-3L
AWAY Boreham Wood
1.00 Avg Goals (FT) 1.33
48% Ball Possession 52%
10 Total Shots 16
5 Shots on Target 6
3 Corners 7
2 Yellow Cards 2
13.04.2024 Aldershot Town Aldershot Town 0-3 HT 0-2 Boreham Wood Boreham Wood İBSL
23.09.2023 Boreham Wood Boreham Wood 1-2 HT 0-1 Aldershot Town Aldershot Town İBSL
31.01.2023 Aldershot Town Aldershot Town 0-1 HT 0-0 Boreham Wood Boreham Wood İBSL
16.08.2022 Boreham Wood Boreham Wood 1-2 HT 0-1 Aldershot Town Aldershot Town İBSL
09.04.2022 Aldershot Town Aldershot Town 2-1 HT 1-0 Boreham Wood Boreham Wood İBSL
28.08.2021 Boreham Wood Boreham Wood 1-0 HT 0-0 Aldershot Town Aldershot Town İBSL
REVIEW Aldershot Town vs Boreham Wood
IDDAAKOLIK POST-MATCH REVIEW

Aldershot Town put daylight between themselves and Boreham Wood 2-0. It stood 0-0 at the interval — everything that mattered happened after the restart.

We called this one close before kick-off — 37% / 27% / 36% — and on the day Aldershot Town made the difference.

No strong lean on goals — the model had over 2.5 at 51% and both teams to score at 51%, coin-flips both. The market went further still — the BTTS-yes price closed at 1.57, about 64%.

The head-to-head backdrop: across their last 6 meetings in our records, honours were even at 3 apiece. Scoring in those meetings ran 1.00 a game for Aldershot Town against 1.33 for Boreham Wood.

Aldershot Town vs Boreham Wood Result & Final Score

Aldershot Town 2-0 Boreham Wood in the England - FA Cup on 01/02/2025. The analysis above shows what our model predicted before kick-off next to what actually happened.

Aldershot Town vs Boreham Wood Prediction vs Result

Before kick-off our model rated a Aldershot Town win the most likely single outcome at about 37%, with the full match-result split Aldershot Town 37%, draw 27%, Boreham Wood 36%. The final score 2-0 confirmed our model's pre-match leads on Match Result (Aldershot Town) — while Over 2.5, BTTS Yes went the other way.

✓ Match Result (Aldershot Town) ✗ Over 2.5 ✗ BTTS Yes
Want to know how this prediction was produced? Read how we price a match →
Want to test this kind of bet across 26 seasons yourself? Open Match Studio →
İNFAT More England - FA Cup
1 Feb 2025
18:00 Altrincham vs Eastleigh Analysis →
18:00 Southend United vs Sittingbourne Analysis →
18:00 Gainsborough Trinity vs Woking Analysis →
18:00 Kidderminster Harriers vs Sutton United Analysis →
18:00 Oxford City vs Forest Green Rovers Analysis →
18:00 Worthing vs Rochdale Analysis →