Karadağ (K) 1-1 Galler (K) — Result, Statistics & Match Review — Women's World Cup, 5 Jun 2026

📅05/06/2026 · 🕒19:00 Istanbul · GMT+3
Top 2 Score Predictions
1st Score 1-3 2nd Score 1-2
MODEL iddaakolik · Our Predictions
Probability per market · Global + League + Team blend
⏱ Odds and predictions are pre-match — updates freeze from ~20 minutes before kick-off.
Match Result
Home
12%
12.23
Draw
19%
8.11
Away
69%
1.1
Under/Over 2.5
Under 2.5
42%
3.94
Over 2.5
58%
1.22
Both Teams to Score
Yes
51%
2.75
No
49%
1.39
Total Goals
0-1 Goal
26%
8.64
2-3 Goals
32%
2.38
4-5 Goals
30%
2.23
6+ Goals
12%
3.45
Half Time / Full Time
1/1
3%
1/2
11%
1/X
5%
X/1
6%
X/2
19%
X/X
7%
2/1
3%
2/2
39%
2/X
7%
PRO iddaakolik · Analysis Engine
Model vs Market · Probabilities · Discipline
Model vs Market — where we differ
iddaakolik Market EU Bookmakers
12%
Home Win
5%
+6.7pp
19%
Draw
9%
+10.0pp
69%
Away Win
86%
-16.8pp
42%
Under 2.5
22%
+20.1pp
58%
Over 2.5
78%
-20.1pp
51%
BTTS Yes
32%
+19.0pp
49%
BTTS No
68%
-19.0pp
gold — our model green — our served pick grey — EU market (margin removed: each group sums to 100%)
Edge (pp): green = we see more probability than the market · gold = essentially even (±0.5pp) · red = we see less. The Decision above outranks any single row: the engine backs well-supported edges, not merely big ones.
PREVIEW Match Preview Engine
iddaakolik Team Elo · Form · Goals signals
HOME Karadağ (K) EU Bookmakers 8%
Head to Head
AWAY Galler (K) EU Bookmakers 91%
-3% / -3% Team Performance vs MarketAll History / Recent Form · above/below bookmaker expectations +3% / +3%
1.00/4.00 Expected GoalsScored / Conceded 1.00/0.00
+50% / -28% Attack / Defense(vs League Avg.) -67% /
34% Ball Possession 66%
9 Total Shots 16
4 Shots on Target 6
3 Corners 8
225 · 74% PassesSuccessful · Accuracy 573 · 88%
Box TouchesOpposition Penalty Area 28.6
Crosses 30.2
5.0 Yellow Cards 1.2
H2H Past Meetings
Real recorded figures, averaged over these meetings
HOME Karadağ (K)
0W-0D-1L
AWAY Galler (K)
1.00 Avg Goals (FT) 6.00
0.47 xG 5.06
27% Ball Possession 73%
7 Total Shots 16
2 Shots on Target 7
3 Corners 5
145 Passes 599
64% Pass Accuracy 89%
9 Box Touches 33
10 Crosses 13
0 Yellow Cards 1
07.03.2026 Galler (K) Galler (K) 6-1 HT 5-0 Karadağ (K) Karadağ (K) KDK
RESULT Match Result
Real recorded figures from this match
HOME Karadağ (K)
1-1
AWAY Galler (K)
1.04 xG 1.87
27% Ball Possession 73%
5 Total Shots 8
3 Shots on Target 4
0 Corners 6
87 Passes 591
4 Box Touches 20
1 Crosses 33
3 Yellow Cards 0
POST-MATCH Karadağ (K) vs Galler (K)
iddaakolik Post-Match Analysis — what we said & what happened

Karadağ (K) and Galler (K) couldn't be separated, finishing 1-1. Half-time: 0-1.

This one beat our numbers. Galler (K) carried 69% before kick-off and it didn't land — a reminder that even strong leads lose regularly. The goals read — over 2.5 goals (58%) — went the other way, though.

On the day, Karadağ (K) had 27% of the ball to Galler (K)'s 73%, shots finished 5-8, expected goals 1.04 to 1.87.

What was the final score of Karadağ (K) vs Galler (K)?

Karadağ (K) 1-1 Galler (K) in the Women's World Cup on 05/06/2026. The analysis above shows what our model predicted before kick-off next to what actually happened.

What did the model predict for Karadağ (K) vs Galler (K)?

Before kick-off our model rated an Galler (K) win the most likely single outcome at about 69%, with the full match-result split Karadağ (K) 12%, draw 19%, Galler (K) 69%. The final score 1-1 confirmed our model's pre-match leads on BTTS Yes — while Match Result (Galler (K)), Over 2.5 went the other way.

✗ Match Result (Galler (K)) ✗ Over 2.5 ✓ BTTS Yes
Want to know how this prediction was produced? Read how we price a match →
Want to test this kind of bet across 26 seasons yourself? Open Match Studio →
KDK More Women's World Cup
5 Jun 2026
16:30 Gürcistan (K) vs Faroe Adaları (K) Analysis →
17:00 Slovakya (K) vs Finlandiya (K) Analysis →
17:00 Azerbaycan (K) vs Macaristan (K) Analysis →
17:00 Ermenistan (K) vs Kazakistan (K) Analysis →
18:00 Bulgaristan (K) vs Cebelitarık (K) Analysis →
18:00 Moldova (K) vs Romanya (K) Analysis →