Metaloglobus 2-2 UTA Arad — Result, Statistics & Match Review — Romania - 1st Division, 7 Mar 2026

📅07/03/2026 · 🕒15:30 Istanbul · GMT+3
Top 2 Score Predictions
1st Score 0-1 2nd Score 1-1
MODEL iddaakolik · Our Predictions
Probability per market · Global + League + Team blend
⏱ Odds and predictions are pre-match — updates freeze from ~20 minutes before kick-off.
Match Result
Home
21%
4.04
Draw
23%
3.45
Away
56%
1.74
Under/Over 2.5
Under 2.5
53%
1.75
Over 2.5
47%
1.97
Both Teams to Score
Yes
50%
1.9
No
50%
1.81
Total Goals
0-1 Goal EV+ ✗
29%
2.8
2-3 Goals
45%
1.7
4-5 Goals
17%
3.71
6+ Goals
9%
16.55
Value flag · 0-1 Goal at 2.8 — our 29% vs market 28.1%. Did not land — edges play out over many matches, not one.
Half Time / Full Time
1/1
6%
1/2
17%
1/X
8%
X/1
11%
X/2
17%
X/X
12%
2/1
3%
2/2
22%
2/X
4%
PRO iddaakolik · Analysis Engine
Model vs Market · Probabilities · Discipline
Model vs Market — where we differ
iddaakolik Market EU Bookmakers
21%
Home Win
21%
-0.4pp
23%
Draw
26%
-2.1pp
56%
Away Win
53%
+2.4pp
53%
Under 2.5
53%
+0.2pp
47%
Over 2.5
47%
-0.2pp
50%
BTTS Yes
49%
+1.1pp
50%
BTTS No
51%
-1.1pp
gold — our model green — our served pick grey — EU market (margin removed: each group sums to 100%)
Edge (pp): green = we see more probability than the market · gold = essentially even (±0.5pp) · red = we see less. The Decision above outranks any single row: the engine backs well-supported edges, not merely big ones.
PREVIEW Match Preview Engine
iddaakolik Team Elo · Form · Goals signals
HOME Metaloglobus EU Bookmakers 25%
Head to Head
AWAY UTA Arad EU Bookmakers 57%
-10% / -10% Team Performance vs MarketAll History / Recent Form · above/below bookmaker expectations -1% / -1%
0.51/1.63 Expected GoalsScored / Conceded 1.66/0.65
-52% / -17% Attack / Defense(vs League Avg.) +5% / +30%
45% Ball Possession 55%
10 Total Shots 13
4 Shots on Target 5
4 Corners 6
266 · 74% PassesSuccessful · Accuracy 338 · 80%
18.3 Box TouchesOpposition Penalty Area
22.2 Crosses
2.3 Yellow Cards 1.0
H2H Past Meetings
Real recorded figures, averaged over these meetings
HOME Metaloglobus
0W-0D-1L
AWAY UTA Arad
0.00 Avg Goals (FT) 2.00
0.71 xG 1.25
41% Ball Possession 59%
9 Total Shots 14
2 Shots on Target 3
3 Corners 4
218 Passes 359
70% Pass Accuracy 81%
17 Box Touches 18
15 Crosses 28
2 Yellow Cards 1
02.11.2025 UTA Arad UTA Arad 2-0 HT 0-0 Metaloglobus Metaloglobus ROM
RESULT Match Result
Real recorded figures from this match
HOME Metaloglobus
2-2
AWAY UTA Arad
0.98 xG 1.55
46% Ball Possession 54%
10 Total Shots 19
3 Shots on Target 4
7 Corners 6
238 Passes 296
71% Pass Accuracy 77%
24 Box Touches 43
19 Crosses 27
3 Yellow Cards 0
POST-MATCH Metaloglobus vs UTA Arad
iddaakolik Post-Match Analysis — what we said & what happened

Metaloglobus and UTA Arad couldn't be separated, finishing 2-2. Half-time: 1-1.

This one beat our numbers. UTA Arad carried 56% before kick-off and it didn't land — a reminder that even strong leads lose regularly.

Over 2.5 goals sat near a coin-flip at 47% and both teams to score was close to even at 50%.

On the day, Metaloglobus had 46% of the ball to UTA Arad's 54%, shots finished 10-19, expected goals 0.98 to 1.55.

What was the final score of Metaloglobus vs UTA Arad?

Metaloglobus 2-2 UTA Arad in the Romania - 1st Division on 07/03/2026. The analysis above shows what our model predicted before kick-off next to what actually happened.

What did the model predict for Metaloglobus vs UTA Arad?

Before kick-off our model rated an UTA Arad win the most likely single outcome at about 56%, with the full match-result split Metaloglobus 21%, draw 23%, UTA Arad 56%. The final score 2-2 went against our main leads this time — single matches are noisy by nature; our accuracy is measured across thousands of predictions, not one result.

✗ Match Result (UTA Arad) ✗ Under 2.5
Want to know how this prediction was produced? Read how we price a match →
Want to test this kind of bet across 26 seasons yourself? Open Match Studio →
ROM More Romania - 1st Division
7 Mar 2026
18:00 Botosani vs Petrolul 52 Analysis →
21:00 FCSB vs Universitatea Cluj Analysis →