Husqvarna FF 5-0 Rosengard — Result, Statistics & Match Review — Sweden - 1st Division, 8 Nov 2025

📅08/11/2025 · 🕒17:00 Istanbul · GMT+3
Top 2 Score Predictions
1st Score 2-1 2nd Score 1-2
MODEL iddaakolik · Our Predictions
Probability per market · Global + League + Team blend
⏱ Odds and predictions are pre-match — updates freeze from ~20 minutes before kick-off.
Match Result
Home
53%
1.64
Draw
21%
3.8
Away
26%
4.31
Under/Over 2.5
Under 2.5
47%
2.07
Over 2.5
53%
1.68
Both Teams to Score
Yes
58%
1.73
No
42%
1.99
Total Goals
0-1 Goal
28%
2-3 Goals
43%
4-5 Goals
21%
6+ Goals
8%
Half Time / Full Time
1/1
19%
1/2
7%
1/X
7%
X/1
23%
X/2
8%
X/X
8%
2/1
11%
2/2
11%
2/X
6%
PRO iddaakolik · Analysis Engine
Model vs Market · Probabilities · Discipline
💡 For the risk lovers: Home Win ★★ — pattern-based signals at fair odds; informational, not a sized bet.
Model vs Market — where we differ
iddaakolik Market EU Bookmakers
53%
Home Win
57%
-4.1pp
22%
Draw
23%
-1.5pp
26%
Away Win
20%
+5.5pp
47%
Under 2.5
44%
+2.7pp
53%
Over 2.5
56%
-2.7pp
58%
BTTS Yes
54%
+3.7pp
42%
BTTS No
46%
-3.7pp
gold — our model green — our served pick grey — EU market (margin removed: each group sums to 100%)
Edge (pp): green = we see more probability than the market · gold = essentially even (±0.5pp) · red = we see less. The Decision above outranks any single row: the engine backs well-supported edges, not merely big ones.
PREVIEW Match Preview Engine
iddaakolik Team Elo · Form · Goals signals
HOME Husqvarna FF EU Bookmakers 61%
Head to Head
AWAY Rosengard EU Bookmakers 23%
-19% / -19% Team Performance vs MarketAll History / Recent Form · above/below bookmaker expectations +14% / +14%
2.98/0.99 Expected GoalsScored / Conceded 1.21/1.52
+48% / +17% Attack / Defense(vs League Avg.) -7% / +20%
53% Ball Possession 47%
15 Total Shots 11
5 Shots on Target 4
7 Corners 4
394 · 81% PassesSuccessful · Accuracy 273 · 74%
Box TouchesOpposition Penalty Area
Crosses
1.0 Yellow Cards 1.5
H2H Past Meetings
Real recorded figures, averaged over these meetings
HOME Husqvarna FF
0W-0D-1L
AWAY Rosengard
1.00 Avg Goals (FT) 2.00
55% Ball Possession 45%
10 Total Shots 14
2 Shots on Target 4
6 Corners 8
0 Yellow Cards 1
29.03.2025 Rosengard Rosengard 2-1 HT 1-0 Husqvarna FF Husqvarna FF İSÇ3
RESULT Match Result
Real recorded figures from this match
HOME Husqvarna FF
5-0
AWAY Rosengard
47% Ball Possession 53%
16 Total Shots 11
8 Shots on Target 6
6 Corners 9
1 Yellow Cards 0
POST-MATCH Husqvarna FF vs Rosengard
iddaakolik Post-Match Analysis — what we said & what happened

Husqvarna FF cruised past Rosengard 5-0. The game was level at 0-0 at the break, so the decisive goals came after it. 5 goals made it one of the day's more open games.

As our pre-match numbers suggested, our model had Husqvarna FF as the likeliest winner at 53%, and the 5-0 landed on that lead. The goals read — both teams to score (58%) — went the other way, though.

On the day, Husqvarna FF had 47% of the ball to Rosengard's 53%, shots finished 16-11.

What was the final score of Husqvarna FF vs Rosengard?

Husqvarna FF 5-0 Rosengard in the Sweden - 1st Division on 08/11/2025. The analysis above shows what our model predicted before kick-off next to what actually happened.

What did the model predict for Husqvarna FF vs Rosengard?

Before kick-off our model rated a Husqvarna FF win the most likely single outcome at about 53%, with the full match-result split Husqvarna FF 53%, draw 22%, Rosengard 26%. The final score 5-0 confirmed our model's pre-match leads on Match Result (Husqvarna FF), Over 2.5 — while BTTS Yes went the other way.

✓ Match Result (Husqvarna FF) ✓ Over 2.5 ✗ BTTS Yes
Want to know how this prediction was produced? Read how we price a match →
Want to test this kind of bet across 26 seasons yourself? Open Match Studio →
İSÇ3 More Sweden - 1st Division
8 Nov 2025
17:00 Lunds BK vs IFK Skövde Analysis →
17:00 Hassleholms IF vs Angelholm Analysis →
17:00 Skövde AIK vs BK Olympic Analysis →
17:00 Eskilsminne vs Jönköpings Södra Analysis →
17:00 FC Trollhattan vs Norrby IF Analysis →
17:00 Oskarshamns AIK vs Ljungskile Analysis →