Charleston Battery vs Louisville City Prediction — Model Probabilities
Edge (pp): green = we see more probability than the market · gold = essentially even (±0.5pp) · red = we see less. The Decision above outranks any single row: the engine backs well-supported edges, not merely big ones.
Charleston Battery v Louisville City — Team-Based Signals
Charleston Battery vs Louisville City Head-to-Head — Last 6 Meetings
2-1
HT 1-0
Louisville City
USLP
1-1
HT 0-0
Charleston Battery
USLP
0-0
HT 0-0
Louisville City
USLP
4-1
HT 1-1
Charleston Battery
USLP
1-1
HT 1-0
Louisville City
USLP
1-2
HT 1-1
Louisville City
USLP
Charleston Battery 3-2 Louisville City — Actual Match Statistics
Charleston Battery edged past Louisville City 3-2. Half-time: 3-1. 5 goals made it one of the day's more open games.
As our pre-match numbers suggested, our model had Charleston Battery as the likeliest winner at 43%, and the 3-2 landed on that lead.
Over 2.5 goals sat near a coin-flip at 48% and both teams to score was close to even at 50%.
On the day, Charleston Battery had 51% of the ball to Louisville City's 49%, shots finished 22-10, expected goals 3.40 to 1.91 — an xG gap that size says the one-goal margin undersold Charleston Battery's control.
For context: across their last 6 meetings in our records, Louisville City led the recent series with 2 wins, 3 drawn. Those games averaged 1.00 goals for Charleston Battery and 1.50 for Louisville City.
What was the final score of Charleston Battery vs Louisville City?
Charleston Battery 3-2 Louisville City in the USL Championship on 10/04/2024. The analysis above shows what our model predicted before kick-off next to what actually happened.
What did the model predict for Charleston Battery vs Louisville City?
Before kick-off our model rated a Charleston Battery win the most likely single outcome at about 43%, with the full match-result split Charleston Battery 43%, draw 28%, Louisville City 29%. The final score 3-2 confirmed our model's pre-match leads on Match Result (Charleston Battery) — while Under 2.5 went the other way.