Chrudim 3-1 Banik Ostrava II — Result, Statistics & Match Review — Czech Republic - FNL, 21 Mar 2026

📅21/03/2026 · 🕒12:15 Istanbul · GMT+3
Top 2 Score Predictions
1st Score 0-1 2nd Score 1-0
MODEL iddaakolik · Our Predictions
Probability per market · Global + League + Team blend
⏱ Odds and predictions are pre-match — updates freeze from ~20 minutes before kick-off.
Match Result
Home
34%
2.8
Draw
27%
3.28
Away
39%
2.24
Under/Over 2.5
Under 2.5
57%
1.8
Over 2.5
43%
1.91
Both Teams to Score
Yes
48%
1.75
No
52%
1.96
Total Goals
0-1 Goal
35%
2-3 Goals
38%
4-5 Goals
19%
6+ Goals
8%
Half Time / Full Time
1/1
17%
1/2
6%
1/X
6%
X/1
11%
X/2
9%
X/X
15%
2/1
6%
2/2
24%
2/X
6%
PRO iddaakolik · Analysis Engine
Model vs Market · Probabilities · Discipline
Model vs Market — where we differ
iddaakolik Market EU Bookmakers
34%
Home Win
32%
+1.7pp
27%
Draw
27%
-0.1pp
39%
Away Win
41%
-1.5pp
57%
Under 2.5
52%
+5.3pp
43%
Over 2.5
48%
-5.3pp
48%
BTTS Yes
53%
-5.4pp
52%
BTTS No
47%
+5.4pp
gold — our model green — our served pick grey — EU market (margin removed: each group sums to 100%)
Edge (pp): green = we see more probability than the market · gold = essentially even (±0.5pp) · red = we see less. The Decision above outranks any single row: the engine backs well-supported edges, not merely big ones.
PREVIEW Match Preview Engine
iddaakolik Team Elo · Form · Goals signals
HOME Chrudim EU Bookmakers 36%
Head to Head
AWAY Banik Ostrava II EU Bookmakers 45%
+17% / +22% Team Performance vs MarketAll History / Recent Form · above/below bookmaker expectations -54% / -54%
1.62/1.04 Expected GoalsScored / Conceded 0.00/2.00
+29% / +25% Attack / Defense(vs League Avg.) -100% / -36%
48% Ball Possession 52%
8 Total Shots 11
3 Shots on Target 5
5 Corners 5
259 · 71% PassesSuccessful · Accuracy 329 · 76%
Box TouchesOpposition Penalty Area
Crosses
2.1 Yellow Cards 3.0
H2H Past Meetings
Real recorded figures, averaged over these meetings
HOME Chrudim
1W-1D-1L
AWAY Banik Ostrava II
2.67 Avg Goals (FT) 1.33
53% Ball Possession 46%
10 Total Shots 10
3 Shots on Target 2
6 Corners 6
2 Yellow Cards 1
17.08.2025 Banik Ostrava II Banik Ostrava II 2-2 HT 2-2 Chrudim Chrudim ÇEK2
16.03.2025 Banik Ostrava II Banik Ostrava II 1-0 HT 1-0 Chrudim Chrudim ÇEK2
10.08.2024 Chrudim Chrudim 6-1 HT 4-0 Banik Ostrava II Banik Ostrava II ÇEK2
RESULT Match Result
Real recorded figures from this match
HOME Chrudim
3-1
AWAY Banik Ostrava II
48% Ball Possession 52%
14 Total Shots 12
8 Shots on Target 7
5 Corners 8
2 Yellow Cards 1
POST-MATCH Chrudim vs Banik Ostrava II
iddaakolik Post-Match Analysis — what we said & what happened

Chrudim saw off Banik Ostrava II 3-1. Half-time: 2-1.

Our pre-match split (34% / 27% / 39%) promised a tight game; Chrudim found the edge the numbers couldn't. The goals read — under 2.5 goals (57%) — went the other way, though.

On the day, Chrudim had 48% of the ball to Banik Ostrava II's 52%, shots finished 14-12.

For context: across their last 3 meetings in our records, honours were even at 1 apiece, 1 drawn. Those games averaged 2.67 goals for Chrudim and 1.33 for Banik Ostrava II.

What was the final score of Chrudim vs Banik Ostrava II?

Chrudim 3-1 Banik Ostrava II in the Czech Republic - FNL on 21/03/2026. The analysis above shows what our model predicted before kick-off next to what actually happened.

What did the model predict for Chrudim vs Banik Ostrava II?

Before kick-off our model rated an Banik Ostrava II win the most likely single outcome at about 39%, with the full match-result split Chrudim 34%, draw 27%, Banik Ostrava II 39%. The final score 3-1 went against our main leads this time — single matches are noisy by nature; our accuracy is measured across thousands of predictions, not one result.

✗ Match Result (Banik Ostrava II) ✗ Under 2.5 ✗ BTTS No
Want to know how this prediction was produced? Read how we price a match →
Want to test this kind of bet across 26 seasons yourself? Open Match Studio →
ÇEK2 More Czech Republic - FNL
21 Mar 2026
17:00 MAS Taborsko vs Hanacka Analysis →
18:00 Opava vs Jihlava Analysis →
20:00 Lisen vs Usti Nad Labem Analysis →