Tampere United 4-2 FC Jazz — Result, Statistics & Match Review — FİN3, 6 Aug 2025

📅06/08/2025 · 🕒19:00 Istanbul · GMT+3
Top 2 Score Predictions
1st Score 2-1 2nd Score 1-2
MODEL iddaakolik · Our Predictions
Probability per market · Global + League + Team blend
⏱ Odds and predictions are pre-match — updates freeze from ~20 minutes before kick-off.
Match Result
Home
44%
2.27
Draw
23%
3.54
Away
33%
2.54
Under/Over 2.5
Under 2.5
39%
2.33
Over 2.5
61%
1.54
Both Teams to Score
Yes
64%
1.46
No
36%
2.51
Total Goals
0-1 Goal
22%
4.6
2-3 Goals
40%
1.89
4-5 Goals
26%
2.67
6+ Goals
12%
7.01
Half Time / Full Time
1/1
21%
1/2
7%
1/X
7%
X/1
17%
X/2
15%
X/X
10%
2/1
6%
2/2
12%
2/X
5%
PRO iddaakolik · Analysis Engine
Model vs Market · Probabilities · Discipline
Model vs Market — where we differ
iddaakolik Market EU Bookmakers
44%
Home Win
40%
+3.7pp
23%
Draw
25%
-1.6pp
33%
Away Win
35%
-2.0pp
39%
Under 2.5
39%
-0.5pp
61%
Over 2.5
61%
+0.5pp
64%
BTTS Yes
64%
-0.4pp
36%
BTTS No
36%
+0.4pp
gold — our model green — our served pick grey — EU market (margin removed: each group sums to 100%)
Edge (pp): green = we see more probability than the market · gold = essentially even (±0.5pp) · red = we see less. The Decision above outranks any single row: the engine backs well-supported edges, not merely big ones.
PREVIEW Match Preview Engine
iddaakolik Team Elo · Form · Goals signals
HOME Tampere United EU Bookmakers 44%
Head to Head
AWAY FC Jazz EU Bookmakers 39%
-30% / -30% Team Performance vs MarketAll History / Recent Form · above/below bookmaker expectations -16% / -16%
1.27/2.26 Expected GoalsScored / Conceded 1.60/2.70
-29% / -32% Attack / Defense(vs League Avg.) -2% / -35%
50% Ball Possession 50%
15 Total Shots 13
5 Shots on Target 5
6 Corners 5
347 · 80% PassesSuccessful · Accuracy 322 · 78%
Box TouchesOpposition Penalty Area
Crosses
Yellow Cards
H2H Past Meetings
Real recorded figures, averaged over these meetings
HOME Tampere United
1W-0D-5L
AWAY FC Jazz
1.67 Avg Goals (FT) 2.50
56% Ball Possession 45%
18 Total Shots 18
6 Shots on Target 10
8 Corners 4
23.05.2025 FC Jazz FC Jazz 3-2 HT 2-2 Tampere United Tampere United FİN3
29.09.2023 Tampere United Tampere United 2-1 HT 1-1 FC Jazz FC Jazz FİNKAK
12.07.2023 FC Jazz FC Jazz 2-1 HT 1-0 Tampere United Tampere United FİNKAK
17.07.2022 Tampere United Tampere United 1-2 HT 1-1 FC Jazz FC Jazz FİNKAK
23.04.2022 FC Jazz FC Jazz 3-1 HT 1-1 Tampere United Tampere United FİNKAK
01.09.2019 Tampere United Tampere United 3-4 HT 3-2 FC Jazz FC Jazz FİNKAK
POST-MATCH Tampere United vs FC Jazz
iddaakolik Post-Match Analysis — what we said & what happened

Tampere United beat FC Jazz 4-2. Half-time: 2-0. 6 goals made it one of the day's more open games.

Just as the model leaned, our model had Tampere United as the likeliest winner at 44%, and the 4-2 landed on that lead. The goals side of the card held up too — over 2.5 goals (61%), both teams to score (64%) came in.

Coming into the game, across their last 6 meetings in our records, FC Jazz led the recent series with 5 wins. Those games averaged 1.67 goals for Tampere United and 2.50 for FC Jazz.

What was the final score of Tampere United vs FC Jazz?

Tampere United 4-2 FC Jazz in the FİN3 on 06/08/2025. The analysis above shows what our model predicted before kick-off next to what actually happened.

What did the model predict for Tampere United vs FC Jazz?

Before kick-off our model rated a Tampere United win the most likely single outcome at about 44%, with the full match-result split Tampere United 44%, draw 23%, FC Jazz 33%. The final score 4-2 confirmed our model's pre-match leads on Match Result (Tampere United), Over 2.5, BTTS Yes — a clean sweep of the main markets.

✓ Match Result (Tampere United) ✓ Over 2.5 ✓ BTTS Yes
Want to know how this prediction was produced? Read how we price a match →
Want to test this kind of bet across 26 seasons yourself? Open Match Studio →
FİN3 More FİN3
6 Aug 2025
18:30 JJK Jyvaskyla vs EPS Analysis →
18:30 OLS vs KuPS Ak. Analysis →
18:30 Mikkeli vs Atlantis Analysis →
18:30 Inter Turku II vs PKKU Analysis →
18:30 KPV Kokkola vs RoPS Analysis →