Celta Vigo II vs Talavera CF Prediction — Model Probabilities
The bookmaker priced every market fairly — no dependable value at these odds, so skipping is the disciplined play.
Our Pick is our best estimate of the outcome; a value flag is a separate, rarer judgement about the price.
Edge (pp): green = we see more probability than the market · gold = essentially even (±0.5pp) · red = we see less. The Decision above outranks any single row: the engine backs well-supported edges, not merely big ones.
Celta Vigo II v Talavera CF — Team-Based Signals
Celta Vigo II vs Talavera CF Head-to-Head — Last 6 Meetings
1-1
HT 0-1
Talavera CF
İS3
1-0
HT 1-0
Celta Vigo II
İS3
1-2
HT 0-0
Celta Vigo II
İS3
1-1
HT 0-1
Celta Vigo II
İS3
2-0
HT 2-0
Talavera CF
İS3
1-2
HT 0-2
Talavera CF
İS3
Celta Vigo II 4-3 Talavera CF — Actual Match Statistics
Celta Vigo II nicked a narrow win over Talavera CF 4-3. It was 0-3 at half-time, meaning the result turned around in the second half. 7 goals made it one of the day's more open games.
As we highlighted before kick-off, our model had Celta Vigo II as the likeliest winner at 48%, and the 4-3 landed on that lead. The goals read — under 2.5 goals (55%) — went the other way, though.
On the day, Celta Vigo II had 62% of the ball to Talavera CF's 38%, shots finished 15-15.
Coming into the game, across their last 6 meetings in our records, honours were even at 2 apiece, 2 drawn. Those games averaged 1.17 goals for Celta Vigo II and 1.00 for Talavera CF.
What was the final score of Celta Vigo II vs Talavera CF?
Celta Vigo II 4-3 Talavera CF in the Spain - 2nd Division B on 08/11/2025. The analysis above shows what our model predicted before kick-off next to what actually happened.
What did the model predict for Celta Vigo II vs Talavera CF?
Before kick-off our model rated a Celta Vigo II win the most likely single outcome at about 48%, with the full match-result split Celta Vigo II 48%, draw 26%, Talavera CF 25%. The final score 4-3 confirmed our model's pre-match leads on Match Result (Celta Vigo II) — while Under 2.5 went the other way.