Neom SC 2-2 Al Taawon — Result, Statistics & Match Review — Saudi Arabia Prosefyonel League, 12 Mar 2026

📅12/03/2026 · 🕒22:00 Istanbul · GMT+3
Top 2 Score Predictions
1st Score 1-0 2nd Score 1-1
MODEL iddaakolik · Our Predictions
Probability per market · Global + League + Team blend
⏱ Odds and predictions are pre-match — updates freeze from ~20 minutes before kick-off.
Match Result
Home
36%
2.27
Draw
27%
3.35
Away
37%
2.69
Under/Over 2.5
Under 2.5
52%
1.9
Over 2.5
48%
1.82
Both Teams to Score
Yes
51%
1.68
No
49%
2.06
Total Goals
0-1 Goal EV+ ✗
31%
3.2
2-3 Goals
38%
1.73
4-5 Goals
22%
3.3
6+ Goals
9%
12.55
Value flag · 0-1 Goal at 3.2 — our 31% vs market 24.2%. Did not land — edges play out over many matches, not one.
Half Time / Full Time
1/1
18%
1/2
6%
1/X
5%
X/1
13%
X/2
10%
X/X
14%
2/1
5%
2/2
21%
2/X
8%
PRO iddaakolik · Analysis Engine
Model vs Market · Probabilities · Discipline
Model vs Market — where we differ
iddaakolik Market EU Bookmakers
36%
Home Win
40%
-3.9pp
27%
Draw
26%
+0.4pp
37%
Away Win
34%
+3.4pp
52%
Under 2.5
49%
+3.4pp
48%
Over 2.5
51%
-3.4pp
51%
BTTS Yes
56%
-4.5pp
49%
BTTS No
44%
+4.4pp
gold — our model green — our served pick grey — EU market (margin removed: each group sums to 100%)
Edge (pp): green = we see more probability than the market · gold = essentially even (±0.5pp) · red = we see less. The Decision above outranks any single row: the engine backs well-supported edges, not merely big ones.
PREVIEW Match Preview Engine
iddaakolik Team Elo · Form · Goals signals
HOME Neom SC EU Bookmakers 44%
Head to Head
AWAY Al Taawon EU Bookmakers 37%
-10% / -10% Team Performance vs MarketAll History / Recent Form · above/below bookmaker expectations +12% / +26%
2.03/0.75 Expected GoalsScored / Conceded 1.45/1.18
-28% / +25% Attack / Defense(vs League Avg.) +26% / +41%
50% Ball Possession 50%
12 Total Shots 11
4 Shots on Target 4
5 Corners 5
324 · 79% PassesSuccessful · Accuracy 335 · 79%
20.0 Box TouchesOpposition Penalty Area 20.3
12.0 Crosses 16.6
3.0 Yellow Cards 2.1
H2H Past Meetings
Real recorded figures, averaged over these meetings
HOME Neom SC
0W-1D-0L
AWAY Al Taawon
1.00 Avg Goals (FT) 1.00
1.48 xG 0.48
51% Ball Possession 49%
15 Total Shots 8
2 Shots on Target 2
1 Corners 8
353 Passes 331
86% Pass Accuracy 85%
22 Box Touches 26
20 Crosses 21
3 Yellow Cards 4
23.11.2025 Al Taawon Al Taawon 1-1 HT 0-0 Neom SC Neom SC SUUD
RESULT Match Result
Real recorded figures from this match
HOME Neom SC
2-2
AWAY Al Taawon
1.40 xG 0.76
45% Ball Possession 55%
17 Total Shots 14
7 Shots on Target 6
5 Corners 2
334 Passes 423
84% Pass Accuracy 86%
28 Box Touches 36
14 Crosses 20
3 Yellow Cards 4
POST-MATCH Neom SC vs Al Taawon
iddaakolik Post-Match Analysis — what we said & what happened

Neom SC and Al Taawon shared the points in a 2-2 draw. It was 1-0 at half-time, meaning the result turned around in the second half.

We called this one close before kick-off — 36% / 27% / 37% — and a draw is about as on-script as that read gets.

Over 2.5 goals sat near a coin-flip at 48% and both teams to score was close to even at 51%.

On the day, Neom SC had 45% of the ball to Al Taawon's 55%, shots finished 17-14, expected goals 1.40 to 0.76.

What was the final score of Neom SC vs Al Taawon?

Neom SC 2-2 Al Taawon in the Saudi Arabia Prosefyonel League on 12/03/2026. The analysis above shows what our model predicted before kick-off next to what actually happened.

What did the model predict for Neom SC vs Al Taawon?

Before kick-off our model rated an Al Taawon win the most likely single outcome at about 37%, with the full match-result split Neom SC 36%, draw 27%, Al Taawon 37%. The final score 2-2 confirmed our model's pre-match leads on BTTS Yes — while Match Result (Al Taawon), Under 2.5 went the other way.

✗ Match Result (Al Taawon) ✗ Under 2.5 ✓ BTTS Yes
Want to know how this prediction was produced? Read how we price a match →
Want to test this kind of bet across 26 seasons yourself? Open Match Studio →
SUUD More Saudi Arabia Prosefyonel League
12 Mar 2026
22:00 Al Hazm vs Al Kholood Analysis →
22:00 Najma vs Damac FC Analysis →