Central Valley Fuego vs Greenville Triumph Prediction — Model Probabilities
Edge (pp): green = we see more probability than the market · gold = essentially even (±0.5pp) · red = we see less. The Decision above outranks any single row: the engine backs well-supported edges, not merely big ones.
Central Valley Fuego v Greenville Triumph — Team-Based Signals
Central Valley Fuego vs Greenville Triumph Head-to-Head — Last 6 Meetings
1-2
HT 0-0
Greenville Triumph
USL1
0-1
HT 0-0
Greenville Triumph
USL1
3-0
HT 2-0
Central Valley Fuego
USL1
1-0
HT 0-0
Central Valley Fuego
USL1
1-1
HT 1-0
Greenville Triumph
USL1
Central Valley Fuego 1-0 Greenville Triumph — Actual Match Statistics
Central Valley Fuego nicked a narrow win over Greenville Triumph 1-0. The game was level at 0-0 at the break, so the decisive goals came after it.
Our pre-match lean was Greenville Triumph at 45%, but a lead that slim is closer to a coin-flip than a call — and it fell the other way. The goals read — over 2.5 goals (57%), both teams to score (55%) — went the other way, though.
On the day, Central Valley Fuego had 38% of the ball to Greenville Triumph's 62%, shots finished 14-15, expected goals 0.97 to 0.79.
Coming into the game, across their last 6 meetings in our records, Greenville Triumph led the recent series with 4 wins, 2 drawn. Those games averaged 0.67 goals for Central Valley Fuego and 1.67 for Greenville Triumph.
What was the final score of Central Valley Fuego vs Greenville Triumph?
Central Valley Fuego 1-0 Greenville Triumph in the USA - USL League 1 on 21/10/2024. The analysis above shows what our model predicted before kick-off next to what actually happened.
What did the model predict for Central Valley Fuego vs Greenville Triumph?
Before kick-off our model rated an Greenville Triumph win the most likely single outcome at about 45%, with the full match-result split Central Valley Fuego 33%, draw 22%, Greenville Triumph 45%. The final score 1-0 went against our main leads this time — single matches are noisy by nature; our accuracy is measured across thousands of predictions, not one result.