Charlotte Ind. vs Charleston Battery Prediction — Model Probabilities
Edge (pp): green = we see more probability than the market · gold = essentially even (±0.5pp) · red = we see less. The Decision above outranks any single row: the engine backs well-supported edges, not merely big ones.
Charlotte Ind. v Charleston Battery — Team-Based Signals
Charlotte Ind. vs Charleston Battery Head-to-Head — Last 6 Meetings
5-1
HT 2-1
Charleston Battery
USLP
2-0
HT 0-0
Charlotte Ind.
USLP
3-0
HT 1-0
Charleston Battery
USLP
0-3
HT 0-2
Charlotte Ind.
USLP
1-2
HT 0-1
Charleston Battery
USLP
1-1
HT 1-1
Charleston Battery
USLP
Charlotte Ind. 3-2 Charleston Battery — Actual Match Statistics
Charlotte Ind. nicked a narrow win over Charleston Battery 3-2. Half-time: 1-0. 5 goals made it one of the day's more open games.
Our pre-match lean was Charleston Battery at 42%, but a lead that slim is closer to a coin-flip than a call — and it fell the other way. We had also flagged over 2.5 goals (57%), both teams to score (59%), and both reads landed as well.
On the day, Charlotte Ind. had 37% of the ball to Charleston Battery's 63%, shots finished 6-18, expected goals 0.43 to 2.05 — on chances, Charleston Battery could feel hard done by.
For context: across their last 6 meetings in our records, Charlotte Ind. had the better of it with 3 wins, 1 drawn. Those games averaged 2.17 goals for Charlotte Ind. and 1.00 for Charleston Battery.
What was the final score of Charlotte Ind. vs Charleston Battery?
Charlotte Ind. 3-2 Charleston Battery in the USA - Open Cup on 01/04/2026. The analysis above shows what our model predicted before kick-off next to what actually happened.
What did the model predict for Charlotte Ind. vs Charleston Battery?
Before kick-off our model rated an Charleston Battery win the most likely single outcome at about 42%, with the full match-result split Charlotte Ind. 36%, draw 23%, Charleston Battery 42%. The final score 3-2 confirmed our model's pre-match leads on Over 2.5, BTTS Yes — while Match Result (Charleston Battery) went the other way.