INAC Kobe Leonessa (K) vs Parceiro Nagano (K) Prediction — Model Probabilities
The bookmaker priced every market fairly — no dependable value at these odds, so skipping is the disciplined play.
Our call is our best estimate of the outcome; a value flag is a separate, rarer judgement about the price.
Edge (pp): green = we see more probability than the market · gold = essentially even (±0.5pp) · red = we see less. The Decision above outranks any single row: the engine backs well-supported edges, not merely big ones.
INAC Kobe Leonessa (K) v Parceiro Nagano (K) — Team-Based Signals
INAC Kobe Leonessa (K) vs Parceiro Nagano (K) Head-to-Head — Last 4 Meetings
INAC Kobe Leonessa (K) 5-1 Parceiro Nagano (K) — Actual Match Statistics
INAC Kobe Leonessa (K) cruised past Parceiro Nagano (K) 5-1. Half-time: 2-0. 6 goals made it one of the day's more open games.
As our pre-match numbers suggested, our model had INAC Kobe Leonessa (K) as the likeliest winner at 84%, and the 5-1 landed on that lead. We had also flagged over 2.5 goals (64%), and that read landed as well.
On the day, INAC Kobe Leonessa (K) had 62% of the ball to Parceiro Nagano (K)'s 38%, shots finished 26-7.
For context: across their last 4 meetings in our records, INAC Kobe Leonessa (K) had the better of it with 4 wins. Those games averaged 2.50 goals for INAC Kobe Leonessa (K) and 0.50 for Parceiro Nagano (K).
What was the final score of INAC Kobe Leonessa (K) vs Parceiro Nagano (K)?
INAC Kobe Leonessa (K) 5-1 Parceiro Nagano (K) in the Japan - WE League Women's on 03/05/2026. The analysis above shows what our model predicted before kick-off next to what actually happened.
What did the model predict for INAC Kobe Leonessa (K) vs Parceiro Nagano (K)?
Before kick-off our model rated a INAC Kobe Leonessa (K) win the most likely single outcome at about 84%, with the full match-result split INAC Kobe Leonessa (K) 84%, draw 8%, Parceiro Nagano (K) 8%. The final score 5-1 confirmed our model's pre-match leads on Match Result (INAC Kobe Leonessa (K)), Over 2.5 — while BTTS No went the other way.