Al Ittihad-Jeddah 7-0 Al Gharafa — Result, Statistics & Match Review — AFC Sampiyonlar League, 10 Feb 2026

📅10/02/2026 · 🕒21:15 Istanbul · GMT+3
Top 2 Score Predictions
1st Score 3-1 2nd Score 2-1
MODEL iddaakolik · Our Predictions
Probability per market · Global + League + Team blend
⏱ Odds and predictions are pre-match — updates freeze from ~20 minutes before kick-off.
Match Result
Home
71%
1.33
Draw
20%
4.81
Away
9%
6.69
Under/Over 2.5
Under 2.5
44%
2.51
Over 2.5
56%
1.48
Both Teams to Score
Yes
51%
1.75
No
49%
1.96
Total Goals
0-1 Goal
25%
5.26
2-3 Goals
34%
1.98
4-5 Goals
28%
2.57
6+ Goals
13%
6.06
Half Time / Full Time
1/1
27%
1.56
1/2
3%
35.0
1/X
5%
19.3
X/1 EV+ ✗
37%
4.0
X/2
3%
16.85
X/X
7%
8.28
2/1
7%
19.95
2/2
4%
13.35
2/X
7%
22.25
Value flag · X/1 at 4.0 — our 37% vs market 20.0%. Did not land — edges play out over many matches, not one.
PRO iddaakolik · Analysis Engine
Model vs Market · Probabilities · Discipline
💡 For the risk lovers: Home Win ★★ — pattern-based signals at fair odds; informational, not a sized bet.
Model vs Market — where we differ
iddaakolik Market EU Bookmakers
71%
Home Win
71%
+0.4pp
20%
Draw
18%
+2.2pp
9%
Away Win
12%
-2.5pp
44%
Under 2.5
36%
+7.6pp
56%
Over 2.5
64%
-7.6pp
51%
BTTS Yes
53%
-1.7pp
49%
BTTS No
47%
+1.7pp
gold — our model green — our served pick grey — EU market (margin removed: each group sums to 100%)
Edge (pp): green = we see more probability than the market · gold = essentially even (±0.5pp) · red = we see less. The Decision above outranks any single row: the engine backs well-supported edges, not merely big ones.
PREVIEW Match Preview Engine
iddaakolik Team Elo · Form · Goals signals
HOME Al Ittihad-Jeddah EU Bookmakers 75%
Head to Head
AWAY Al Gharafa EU Bookmakers 15%
-9% / -9% Team Performance vs MarketAll History / Recent Form · above/below bookmaker expectations -5% / -5%
2.02/0.90 Expected GoalsScored / Conceded 0.68/2.22
-37% / +108% Attack / Defense(vs League Avg.) -37% / -27%
58% Ball Possession 42%
15 Total Shots 9
6 Shots on Target 2
6 Corners 4
422 · 84% PassesSuccessful · Accuracy 313 · 79%
34.3 Box TouchesOpposition Penalty Area 12.7
22.8 Crosses 15.7
2.1 Yellow Cards 1.7
RESULT Match Result
Real recorded figures from this match
HOME Al Ittihad-Jeddah
7-0
AWAY Al Gharafa
4.00 xG 0.64
59% Ball Possession 41%
16 Total Shots 11
9 Shots on Target 3
5 Corners 4
452 Passes 283
89% Pass Accuracy 82%
25 Box Touches 14
14 Crosses 10
1 Yellow Cards 2
POST-MATCH Al Ittihad-Jeddah vs Al Gharafa
iddaakolik Post-Match Analysis — what we said & what happened

Al Ittihad-Jeddah swept aside Al Gharafa 7-0. Half-time: 2-0. 7 goals made it one of the day's more open games.

As we highlighted before kick-off, our model had Al Ittihad-Jeddah as the likeliest winner at 71%, and the 7-0 landed on that lead. The goals side of the card held up too — over 2.5 goals (56%) came in.

On the day, Al Ittihad-Jeddah had 59% of the ball to Al Gharafa's 41%, shots finished 16-11, expected goals 4.00 to 0.64.

What was the final score of Al Ittihad-Jeddah vs Al Gharafa?

Al Ittihad-Jeddah 7-0 Al Gharafa in the AFC Sampiyonlar League on 10/02/2026. The analysis above shows what our model predicted before kick-off next to what actually happened.

What did the model predict for Al Ittihad-Jeddah vs Al Gharafa?

Before kick-off our model rated a Al Ittihad-Jeddah win the most likely single outcome at about 71%, with the full match-result split Al Ittihad-Jeddah 71%, draw 20%, Al Gharafa 9%. The final score 7-0 confirmed our model's pre-match leads on Match Result (Al Ittihad-Jeddah), Over 2.5 — while BTTS Yes went the other way.

✓ Match Result (Al Ittihad-Jeddah) ✓ Over 2.5 ✗ BTTS Yes
Want to know how this prediction was produced? Read how we price a match →
Want to test this kind of bet across 26 seasons yourself? Open Match Studio →
AŞMP More AFC Sampiyonlar League
10 Feb 2026
13:00 Sanfrecce Hiroshima vs Johor DT Analysis →
13:00 Vissel Kobe vs FC Seoul Analysis →
15:15 Shanghai Shenhua vs Machida Zelvia Analysis →
15:15 Chengdu Qianbao vs Buriram United Analysis →
19:00 Tractor FC vs Al Sadd Analysis →