FC Akhmat Grozny vs Zenit St. Petersburg Prediction — Model Probabilities
Edge (pp): green = we see more probability than the market · gold = essentially even (±0.5pp) · red = we see less. The Decision above outranks any single row: the engine backs well-supported edges, not merely big ones.
FC Akhmat Grozny v Zenit St. Petersburg — Team-Based Signals
FC Akhmat Grozny vs Zenit St. Petersburg Head-to-Head — Last 6 Meetings
2-1
HT 2-1
FC Akhmat Grozny
RUS
3-3
HT 2-3
Zenit St. Petersburg
RUK
2-0
HT 1-0
FC Akhmat Grozny
RUK
1-2
HT 0-2
FC Akhmat Grozny
RUS
0-0
HT 0-0
Zenit St. Petersburg
RUS
0-2
HT 0-1
Zenit St. Petersburg
RUS
FC Akhmat Grozny 1-5 Zenit St. Petersburg — Actual Match Statistics
Zenit St. Petersburg ran out comfortable winners over FC Akhmat Grozny 5-1 away from home. Half-time: 1-3. 6 goals made it one of the day's more open games.
Just as the model leaned, our model had Zenit St. Petersburg as the likeliest winner at 48%, and the 5-1 landed on that lead. The goals read — under 2.5 goals (56%), no to both teams scoring (55%) — went the other way, though.
On the day, FC Akhmat Grozny had 37% of the ball to Zenit St. Petersburg's 63%, shots finished 12-15.
Coming into the game, across their last 6 meetings in our records, Zenit St. Petersburg led the recent series with 3 wins, 2 drawn. Those games averaged 1.00 goals for FC Akhmat Grozny and 1.67 for Zenit St. Petersburg.
What was the final score of FC Akhmat Grozny vs Zenit St. Petersburg?
FC Akhmat Grozny 1-5 Zenit St. Petersburg in the Russia - Premier League on 19/05/2024. The analysis above shows what our model predicted before kick-off next to what actually happened.
What did the model predict for FC Akhmat Grozny vs Zenit St. Petersburg?
Before kick-off our model rated an Zenit St. Petersburg win the most likely single outcome at about 48%, with the full match-result split FC Akhmat Grozny 23%, draw 29%, Zenit St. Petersburg 48%. The final score 1-5 confirmed our model's pre-match leads on Match Result (Zenit St. Petersburg) — while Under 2.5, BTTS No went the other way.