Queens Park Rangers vs Rotherham United Prediction — Model Probabilities
Edge (pp): green = we see more probability than the market · gold = essentially even (±0.5pp) · red = we see less. The Decision above outranks any single row: the engine backs well-supported edges, not merely big ones.
Queens Park Rangers v Rotherham United — Team-Based Signals
Queens Park Rangers vs Rotherham United Head-to-Head — Last 6 Meetings
1-1
HT 0-0
Queens Park Rangers
İNCL
3-1
HT 1-0
Queens Park Rangers
İNCL
1-1
HT 1-1
Rotherham United
İNCL
1-1
HT 0-0
Rotherham United
FAK
3-1
HT 0-0
Queens Park Rangers
İNCL
3-2
HT 3-1
Rotherham United
İNCL
Queens Park Rangers 2-1 Rotherham United — Actual Match Statistics
Queens Park Rangers nicked a narrow win over Rotherham United 2-1. It was 0-1 at half-time, meaning the result turned around in the second half.
As we highlighted before kick-off, our model had Queens Park Rangers as the likeliest winner at 48%, and the 2-1 landed on that lead. The goals read — under 2.5 goals (58%), no to both teams scoring (56%) — went the other way, though.
On the day, Queens Park Rangers had 64% of the ball to Rotherham United's 36%, shots finished 18-14, expected goals 1.13 to 0.90.
For context: across their last 6 meetings in our records, Rotherham United led the recent series with 2 wins, 3 drawn. Those games averaged 1.33 goals for Queens Park Rangers and 1.83 for Rotherham United.
What was the final score of Queens Park Rangers vs Rotherham United?
Queens Park Rangers 2-1 Rotherham United in the England - Championship on 24/02/2024. The analysis above shows what our model predicted before kick-off next to what actually happened.
What did the model predict for Queens Park Rangers vs Rotherham United?
Before kick-off our model rated a Queens Park Rangers win the most likely single outcome at about 48%, with the full match-result split Queens Park Rangers 48%, draw 26%, Rotherham United 27%. The final score 2-1 confirmed our model's pre-match leads on Match Result (Queens Park Rangers) — while Under 2.5, BTTS No went the other way.