Rakow Czestochowa vs Jagiellonia Bialystok Prediction — Model Probabilities
Edge (pp): green = we see more probability than the market · gold = essentially even (±0.5pp) · red = we see less. The Decision above outranks any single row: the engine backs well-supported edges, not merely big ones.
Rakow Czestochowa v Jagiellonia Bialystok — Team-Based Signals
Rakow Czestochowa vs Jagiellonia Bialystok Head-to-Head — Last 6 Meetings
4-2
HT 2-1
Rakow Czestochowa
POL
3-0
HT 1-0
Jagiellonia Bialystok
POL
1-2
HT 1-1
Rakow Czestochowa
POL
2-2
HT 2-0
Jagiellonia Bialystok
POL
5-0
HT 0-0
Jagiellonia Bialystok
POL
Rakow Czestochowa 1-2 Jagiellonia Bialystok — Actual Match Statistics
Jagiellonia Bialystok nicked a narrow win over Rakow Czestochowa 2-1 away from home. The game was level at 1-1 at the break, so the decisive goals came after it.
Our pre-match lean was Rakow Czestochowa at 47%, but a lead that slim is closer to a coin-flip than a call — and it fell the other way.
Over 2.5 goals sat near a coin-flip at 48% and both teams to score was close to even at 48%.
On the day, Rakow Czestochowa had 46% of the ball to Jagiellonia Bialystok's 54%, shots finished 12-14, expected goals 1.39 to 1.97.
For context: across their last 6 meetings in our records, Rakow Czestochowa had the better of it with 3 wins, 2 drawn. Those games averaged 2.67 goals for Rakow Czestochowa and 1.50 for Jagiellonia Bialystok.
What was the final score of Rakow Czestochowa vs Jagiellonia Bialystok?
Rakow Czestochowa 1-2 Jagiellonia Bialystok in the Poland - Ekstraklasa on 10/05/2025. The analysis above shows what our model predicted before kick-off next to what actually happened.
What did the model predict for Rakow Czestochowa vs Jagiellonia Bialystok?
Before kick-off our model rated a Rakow Czestochowa win the most likely single outcome at about 47%, with the full match-result split Rakow Czestochowa 47%, draw 25%, Jagiellonia Bialystok 27%. The final score 1-2 went against our main leads this time — single matches are noisy by nature; our accuracy is measured across thousands of predictions, not one result.