Imabari 1-2 Mito HollyHock — Result, Statistics & Match Review — Japan - J2 League, 21 Jun 2025

📅21/06/2025 · 🕒00:00 Istanbul · GMT+3
Top 2 Score Predictions
1st Score 1-0 2nd Score 0-1
MODEL iddaakolik · Our Predictions
Probability per market · Global + League + Team blend
⏱ Odds and predictions are pre-match — updates freeze from ~20 minutes before kick-off.
Match Result
Home
37%
2.67
Draw
25%
3.11
Away
38%
2.47
Under/Over 2.5
Under 2.5
57%
1.6
Over 2.5
43%
2.21
Both Teams to Score
Yes
47%
1.95
No
53%
1.76
Total Goals
0-1 Goal
31%
2.4
2-3 Goals
43%
1.74
4-5 Goals
18%
4.55
6+ Goals
8%
25.0
Half Time / Full Time
1/1
18%
1/2
7%
1/X
7%
X/1
9%
X/2
15%
X/X
12%
2/1
10%
2/2
16%
2/X
6%
PRO iddaakolik · Analysis Engine
Model vs Market · Probabilities · Discipline
💡 For the risk lovers: Away Win ★★★ — pattern-based signals at fair odds; informational, not a sized bet.
Model vs Market — where we differ
iddaakolik Market EU Bookmakers
37%
Home Win
34%
+2.6pp
26%
Draw
29%
-3.3pp
38%
Away Win
37%
+0.7pp
57%
Under 2.5
59%
-1.2pp
43%
Over 2.5
41%
+1.2pp
47%
BTTS Yes
47%
-0.6pp
53%
BTTS No
53%
+0.6pp
gold — our model green — our served pick grey — EU market (margin removed: each group sums to 100%)
Edge (pp): green = we see more probability than the market · gold = essentially even (±0.5pp) · red = we see less. The Decision above outranks any single row: the engine backs well-supported edges, not merely big ones.
PREVIEW Match Preview Engine
iddaakolik Team Elo · Form · Goals signals
HOME Imabari EU Bookmakers 37%
Head to Head
AWAY Mito HollyHock EU Bookmakers 40%
-23% / -23% Team Performance vs MarketAll History / Recent Form · above/below bookmaker expectations +5% / +5%
0.79/0.80 Expected GoalsScored / Conceded 1.48/1.30
-34% / +47% Attack / Defense(vs League Avg.) +23% / -13%
51% Ball Possession 49%
10 Total Shots 9
3 Shots on Target 4
5 Corners 4
323 · 70% PassesSuccessful · Accuracy 328 · 73%
Box TouchesOpposition Penalty Area
22.9 Crosses 17.8
1.0 Yellow Cards 1.1
H2H Past Meetings
Real recorded figures, averaged over these meetings
HOME Imabari
0W-1D-0L
AWAY Mito HollyHock
0.00 Avg Goals (FT) 0.00
44% Ball Possession 56%
6 Total Shots 8
1 Shots on Target 3
3 Corners 7
229 Passes 313
67% Pass Accuracy 74%
15 Crosses 20
29.04.2025 Mito HollyHock Mito HollyHock 0-0 HT 0-0 Imabari Imabari JAP2
RESULT Match Result
Real recorded figures from this match
HOME Imabari
1-2
AWAY Mito HollyHock
49% Ball Possession 51%
12 Total Shots 11
7 Shots on Target 3
3 Corners 5
POST-MATCH Imabari vs Mito HollyHock
iddaakolik Post-Match Analysis — what we said & what happened

Mito HollyHock edged past Imabari 2-1 away from home. The game was level at 0-0 at the break, so the decisive goals came after it.

Our pre-match split (37% / 26% / 38%) promised a tight game; Mito HollyHock found the edge the numbers couldn't. The goals read — under 2.5 goals (57%) — went the other way, though.

On the day, Imabari had 49% of the ball to Mito HollyHock's 51%, shots finished 12-11.

What was the final score of Imabari vs Mito HollyHock?

Imabari 1-2 Mito HollyHock in the Japan - J2 League on 21/06/2025. The analysis above shows what our model predicted before kick-off next to what actually happened.

What did the model predict for Imabari vs Mito HollyHock?

Before kick-off our model rated an Mito HollyHock win the most likely single outcome at about 38%, with the full match-result split Imabari 37%, draw 26%, Mito HollyHock 38%. The final score 1-2 confirmed our model's pre-match leads on Match Result (Mito HollyHock) — while Under 2.5, BTTS No went the other way.

✓ Match Result (Mito HollyHock) ✗ Under 2.5 ✗ BTTS No
Want to know how this prediction was produced? Read how we price a match →
Want to test this kind of bet across 26 seasons yourself? Open Match Studio →
JAP2 More Japan - J2 League
21 Jun 2025
10:00 Iwaki vs Kataller Toyama Analysis →
12:00 Ehime FC vs Renofa Yamaguchi Analysis →
13:00 Fujieda MYFC vs Consadole Sapporo Analysis →
13:00 JEF United vs Jubilo Iwata Analysis →
13:00 Omiya Ardija vs Sagan Tosu Analysis →
13:00 Tokushima Vortis vs Oita Trinita Analysis →