Swansea City vs Queens Park Rangers Prediction — Model Probabilities
The bookmaker priced every market fairly — no dependable value at these odds, so skipping is the disciplined play.
Our call is our best estimate of the outcome; a value flag is a separate, rarer judgement about the price.
Edge (pp): green = we see more probability than the market · gold = essentially even (±0.5pp) · red = we see less. The Decision above outranks any single row: the engine backs well-supported edges, not merely big ones.
Swansea City v Queens Park Rangers — Team-Based Signals
Swansea City vs Queens Park Rangers Head-to-Head — Last 6 Meetings
1-1
HT 0-1
Swansea City
İNCL
1-1
HT 1-0
Swansea City
İNCL
1-0
HT 1-0
Queens Park Rangers
İNCL
0-1
HT 0-0
Queens Park Rangers
İNCL
0-0
HT 0-0
Swansea City
İNCL
Swansea City 3-0 Queens Park Rangers — Actual Match Statistics
Swansea City ran out comfortable winners over Queens Park Rangers 3-0.
Just as the model leaned, our model had Swansea City as the likeliest winner at 42%, and the 3-0 landed on that lead. On goals, no to both teams scoring (56%) landed while under 2.5 goals (57%) missed.
On the day, Swansea City had 71% of the ball to Queens Park Rangers's 29%, shots finished 10-4, expected goals 1.57 to 0.43.
Coming into the game, across their last 6 meetings in our records, Queens Park Rangers led the recent series with 2 wins, 3 drawn. Those games averaged 0.50 goals for Swansea City and 0.67 for Queens Park Rangers.
What was the final score of Swansea City vs Queens Park Rangers?
Swansea City 3-0 Queens Park Rangers in the England - Championship on 26/12/2024. The analysis above shows what our model predicted before kick-off next to what actually happened.
What did the model predict for Swansea City vs Queens Park Rangers?
Before kick-off our model rated a Swansea City win the most likely single outcome at about 42%, with the full match-result split Swansea City 42%, draw 29%, Queens Park Rangers 29%. The final score 3-0 confirmed our model's pre-match leads on Match Result (Swansea City), BTTS No — while Under 2.5 went the other way.