Bristol Rovers vs Charlton Athletic Prediction — Model Probabilities
Edge (pp): green = we see more probability than the market · gold = essentially even (±0.5pp) · red = we see less. The Decision above outranks any single row: the engine backs well-supported edges, not merely big ones.
Bristol Rovers v Charlton Athletic — Team-Based Signals
Bristol Rovers vs Charlton Athletic Head-to-Head — Last 6 Meetings
2-1
HT 0-0
Charlton Athletic
İN1
1-2
HT 0-0
Bristol Rovers
İN1
1-0
HT 0-0
Charlton Athletic
İN1
1-2
HT 1-0
Bristol Rovers
İN1
3-2
HT 2-2
Bristol Rovers
İN1
0-1
HT 0-0
Charlton Athletic
İN1
Bristol Rovers 3-2 Charlton Athletic — Actual Match Statistics
Bristol Rovers nicked a narrow win over Charlton Athletic 3-2. Half-time: 1-0. 5 goals made it one of the day's more open games.
Our pre-match lean was Charlton Athletic at 46%, but a lead that slim is closer to a coin-flip than a call — and it fell the other way. The goals read — under 2.5 goals (59%), no to both teams scoring (57%) — went the other way, though.
On the day, Bristol Rovers had 39% of the ball to Charlton Athletic's 61%, shots finished 9-12, expected goals 0.71 to 1.93 — the balance of chances actually favoured Charlton Athletic.
For context: across their last 6 meetings in our records, Bristol Rovers had the better of it with 4 wins. Those games averaged 1.50 goals for Bristol Rovers and 1.17 for Charlton Athletic.
What was the final score of Bristol Rovers vs Charlton Athletic?
Bristol Rovers 3-2 Charlton Athletic in the England - 1st Division on 01/10/2024. The analysis above shows what our model predicted before kick-off next to what actually happened.
What did the model predict for Bristol Rovers vs Charlton Athletic?
Before kick-off our model rated an Charlton Athletic win the most likely single outcome at about 46%, with the full match-result split Bristol Rovers 27%, draw 27%, Charlton Athletic 46%. The final score 3-2 went against our main leads this time — single matches are noisy by nature; our accuracy is measured across thousands of predictions, not one result.