Mısır 2-1 Burkina Faso — Result, Statistics & Match Review — World Cup Qualifiers, 6 Jun 2024

📅06/06/2024 · 🕒22:00 Istanbul · GMT+3
Top 2 Score Predictions
1st Score 1-0 2nd Score 2-0
MODEL iddaakolik · Our Predictions
Probability per market · Global + League + Team blend
⏱ Odds and predictions are pre-match — updates freeze from ~20 minutes before kick-off.
Match Result
Home
52%
1.53
Draw
24%
3.8
Away
24%
5.27
Under/Over 2.5
Under 2.5
54%
1.75
Over 2.5
46%
1.97
Both Teams to Score
Yes
44%
2.09
No
56%
1.66
Total Goals
0-1 Goal EV+ ✗
32%
2.94
2-3 Goals
41%
1.77
4-5 Goals
18%
3.96
6+ Goals
9%
18.05
Value flag · 0-1 Goal at 2.94 — our 32% vs market 28.2%. Did not land — edges play out over many matches, not one.
Half Time / Full Time
1/1
18%
1/2
6%
1/X
8%
X/1
26%
X/2
7%
X/X
10%
2/1
8%
2/2
11%
2/X
6%
PRO iddaakolik · Analysis Engine
Model vs Market · Probabilities · Discipline
💡 For the risk lovers: Home Win ★★★ — pattern-based signals at fair odds; informational, not a sized bet.
Model vs Market — where we differ
iddaakolik Market EU Bookmakers
52%
Home Win
61%
-8.9pp
24%
Draw
23%
+0.6pp
24%
Away Win
16%
+8.3pp
54%
Under 2.5
53%
+0.7pp
46%
Over 2.5
47%
-0.7pp
44%
BTTS Yes
44%
+0.7pp
56%
BTTS No
56%
-0.7pp
gold — our model green — our served pick grey — EU market (margin removed: each group sums to 100%)
Edge (pp): green = we see more probability than the market · gold = essentially even (±0.5pp) · red = we see less. The Decision above outranks any single row: the engine backs well-supported edges, not merely big ones.
PREVIEW Match Preview Engine
iddaakolik Team Elo · Form · Goals signals
HOME Mısır EU Bookmakers 66%
Head to Head
AWAY Burkina Faso EU Bookmakers 19%
+21% / +21% Team Performance vs MarketAll History / Recent Form · above/below bookmaker expectations -12% / -12%
1.94/0.21 Expected GoalsScored / Conceded 0.77/1.56
-24% / +74% Attack / Defense(vs League Avg.) -43% / +5%
57% Ball Possession 43%
14 Total Shots 7
5 Shots on Target 2
5 Corners 2
402 · 79% PassesSuccessful · Accuracy 283 · 72%
18.0 Box TouchesOpposition Penalty Area 13.0
9.0 Crosses 16.6
1.2 Yellow Cards 2.5
H2H Past Meetings
Real recorded figures, averaged over these meetings
HOME Mısır
0W-1D-0L
AWAY Burkina Faso
1.00 Avg Goals (FT) 1.00
39% Ball Possession 61%
6 Total Shots 24
2 Shots on Target 8
3 Corners 12
300 Passes 609
76% Pass Accuracy 86%
16 Box Touches 41
11 Crosses 24
2 Yellow Cards 2
01.02.2017 Burkina Faso Burkina Faso 1-1 HT 0-0 Mısır Mısır AFUK
RESULT Match Result
Real recorded figures from this match
HOME Mısır
2-1
AWAY Burkina Faso
59% Ball Possession 41%
10 Total Shots 10
5 Shots on Target 4
6 Corners 5
2 Yellow Cards 1
POST-MATCH Mısır vs Burkina Faso
iddaakolik Post-Match Analysis — what we said & what happened

Mısır nicked a narrow win over Burkina Faso 2-1. Half-time: 2-0.

As we said in the preview, our model had Mısır as the likeliest winner at 52%, and the 2-1 landed on that lead. The goals read — no to both teams scoring (56%) — went the other way, though.

On the day, Mısır had 59% of the ball to Burkina Faso's 41%, shots finished 10-10.

What was the final score of Mısır vs Burkina Faso?

Mısır 2-1 Burkina Faso in the World Cup Qualifiers on 06/06/2024. The analysis above shows what our model predicted before kick-off next to what actually happened.

What did the model predict for Mısır vs Burkina Faso?

Before kick-off our model rated a Mısır win the most likely single outcome at about 52%, with the full match-result split Mısır 52%, draw 24%, Burkina Faso 24%. The final score 2-1 confirmed our model's pre-match leads on Match Result (Mısır) — while Under 2.5, BTTS No went the other way.

✓ Match Result (Mısır) ✗ Under 2.5 ✗ BTTS No
Want to know how this prediction was produced? Read how we price a match →
Want to test this kind of bet across 26 seasons yourself? Open Match Studio →
DKE More World Cup Qualifiers
6 Jun 2024
02:30 Trinidad & Tobago vs Grenada Analysis →
12:00 Endonezya vs Irak Analysis →
13:45 Bangladeş vs Avustralya Analysis →
14:00 Tayvan vs Umman Analysis →
15:00 Çin vs Tayland Analysis →
15:00 Vietnam SR vs Filipinler Analysis →