Charleston Battery vs Pittsburgh Riverhounds Prediction — Model Probabilities
Edge (pp): green = we see more probability than the market · gold = essentially even (±0.5pp) · red = we see less. The Decision above outranks any single row: the engine backs well-supported edges, not merely big ones.
Charleston Battery v Pittsburgh Riverhounds — Team-Based Signals
Charleston Battery vs Pittsburgh Riverhounds Head-to-Head — Last 6 Meetings
3-1
HT 2-0
Pittsburgh Riverhounds
USLP
2-0
HT 1-0
Charleston Battery
USLP
0-0
HT 0-0
Charleston Battery
USLP
Charleston Battery 2-1 Pittsburgh Riverhounds — Actual Match Statistics
Charleston Battery nicked a narrow win over Pittsburgh Riverhounds 2-1. It was 0-1 at half-time, meaning the result turned around in the second half.
As our pre-match numbers suggested, our model had Charleston Battery as the likeliest winner at 41%, and the 2-1 landed on that lead. The goals read — under 2.5 goals (70%), no to both teams scoring (57%) — went the other way, though.
On the day, Charleston Battery had 63% of the ball to Pittsburgh Riverhounds's 37%, shots finished 19-6, expected goals 2.58 to 0.24 — an xG gap that size says the one-goal margin undersold Charleston Battery's control.
Coming into the game, across their last 6 meetings in our records, honours were even at 2 apiece, 2 drawn. Those games averaged 0.67 goals for Charleston Battery and 0.83 for Pittsburgh Riverhounds.
What was the final score of Charleston Battery vs Pittsburgh Riverhounds?
Charleston Battery 2-1 Pittsburgh Riverhounds in the USL Championship on 13/04/2025. The analysis above shows what our model predicted before kick-off next to what actually happened.
What did the model predict for Charleston Battery vs Pittsburgh Riverhounds?
Before kick-off our model rated a Charleston Battery win the most likely single outcome at about 41%, with the full match-result split Charleston Battery 41%, draw 33%, Pittsburgh Riverhounds 26%. The final score 2-1 confirmed our model's pre-match leads on Match Result (Charleston Battery) — while Under 2.5, BTTS No went the other way.