Racing Santander vs Racing Ferrol Prediction — Model Probabilities
The bookmaker priced every market fairly — no dependable value at these odds, so skipping is the disciplined play.
Our call is our best estimate of the outcome; a value flag is a separate, rarer judgement about the price.
Edge (pp): green = we see more probability than the market · gold = essentially even (±0.5pp) · red = we see less. The Decision above outranks any single row: the engine backs well-supported edges, not merely big ones.
Racing Santander v Racing Ferrol — Team-Based Signals
Racing Santander vs Racing Ferrol Head-to-Head — Last 6 Meetings
1-3
HT 1-2
Racing Ferrol
İS2
1-0
HT 1-0
Racing Ferrol
İS3
1-1
HT 1-1
Racing Santander
İS3
1-0
HT 1-0
Racing Ferrol
İS3
Racing Santander 6-0 Racing Ferrol — Actual Match Statistics
Racing Santander swept aside Racing Ferrol 6-0. Half-time: 3-0. 6 goals made it one of the day's more open games.
As we said in the preview, our model had Racing Santander as the likeliest winner at 50%, and the 6-0 landed on that lead. The goals read — under 2.5 goals (55%) — went the other way, though.
On the day, Racing Santander had 49% of the ball to Racing Ferrol's 51%, shots finished 18-6, expected goals 3.23 to 0.95.
Coming into the game, across their last 6 meetings in our records, Racing Santander had the better of it with 3 wins, 2 drawn. Those games averaged 1.33 goals for Racing Santander and 1.17 for Racing Ferrol.
What was the final score of Racing Santander vs Racing Ferrol?
Racing Santander 6-0 Racing Ferrol in the Spain - 2nd Division on 19/01/2025. The analysis above shows what our model predicted before kick-off next to what actually happened.
What did the model predict for Racing Santander vs Racing Ferrol?
Before kick-off our model rated a Racing Santander win the most likely single outcome at about 50%, with the full match-result split Racing Santander 50%, draw 26%, Racing Ferrol 24%. The final score 6-0 confirmed our model's pre-match leads on Match Result (Racing Santander), BTTS No — while Under 2.5 went the other way.