Urawa Red Diamonds vs Consadole Sapporo Prediction — Model Probabilities
Edge (pp): green = we see more probability than the market · gold = essentially even (±0.5pp) · red = we see less. The Decision above outranks any single row: the engine backs well-supported edges, not merely big ones.
Urawa Red Diamonds v Consadole Sapporo — Team-Based Signals
Urawa Red Diamonds vs Consadole Sapporo Head-to-Head — Last 6 Meetings
0-2
HT 0-0
Urawa Red Diamonds
JAP
4-1
HT 0-0
Consadole Sapporo
JAP
1-1
HT 0-0
Consadole Sapporo
JAP
1-1
HT 0-1
Urawa Red Diamonds
JAP
2-1
HT 1-0
Urawa Red Diamonds
JAP
Urawa Red Diamonds 3-4 Consadole Sapporo — Actual Match Statistics
Consadole Sapporo nicked a narrow win over Urawa Red Diamonds 4-3 away from home. Half-time: 0-2. 7 goals made it one of the day's more open games.
Our pre-match lean was Urawa Red Diamonds at 48%, but a lead that slim is closer to a coin-flip than a call — and it fell the other way. The goals side of the card held up too — over 2.5 goals (55%) came in.
On the day, Urawa Red Diamonds had 53% of the ball to Consadole Sapporo's 47%, shots finished 19-8, expected goals 2.82 to 0.75 — the balance of chances actually favoured Urawa Red Diamonds.
Coming into the game, across their last 6 meetings in our records, Urawa Red Diamonds had the better of it with 3 wins, 2 drawn. Those games averaged 1.67 goals for Urawa Red Diamonds and 0.83 for Consadole Sapporo.
What was the final score of Urawa Red Diamonds vs Consadole Sapporo?
Urawa Red Diamonds 3-4 Consadole Sapporo in the Japan - J1 League on 20/07/2024. The analysis above shows what our model predicted before kick-off next to what actually happened.
What did the model predict for Urawa Red Diamonds vs Consadole Sapporo?
Before kick-off our model rated a Urawa Red Diamonds win the most likely single outcome at about 48%, with the full match-result split Urawa Red Diamonds 48%, draw 23%, Consadole Sapporo 29%. The final score 3-4 confirmed our model's pre-match leads on Over 2.5, BTTS Yes — while Match Result (Urawa Red Diamonds) went the other way.