Urawa Red Diamonds vs Shonan Bellmare Prediction — Model Probabilities
Edge (pp): green = we see more probability than the market · gold = essentially even (±0.5pp) · red = we see less. The Decision above outranks any single row: the engine backs well-supported edges, not merely big ones.
Urawa Red Diamonds v Shonan Bellmare — Team-Based Signals
Urawa Red Diamonds vs Shonan Bellmare Head-to-Head — Last 6 Meetings
0-1
HT 0-0
Urawa Red Diamonds
JAP
4-1
HT 1-0
Shonan Bellmare
JAP
1-1
HT 1-1
Shonan Bellmare
JLK
0-0
HT 0-0
Urawa Red Diamonds
JLK
0-0
HT 0-0
Urawa Red Diamonds
JAP
Urawa Red Diamonds 2-3 Shonan Bellmare — Actual Match Statistics
Shonan Bellmare squeezed past Urawa Red Diamonds 3-2 away from home. Half-time: 0-1. 5 goals made it one of the day's more open games.
Our pre-match lean was Urawa Red Diamonds at 53%, but a lead that slim is closer to a coin-flip than a call — and it fell the other way. The goals read — no to both teams scoring (55%) — went the other way, though.
On the day, Urawa Red Diamonds had 54% of the ball to Shonan Bellmare's 46%, shots finished 16-12, expected goals 2.12 to 1.45 — on chances, Urawa Red Diamonds could feel hard done by.
Coming into the game, across their last 6 meetings in our records, Urawa Red Diamonds had the better of it with 2 wins, 4 drawn. Those games averaged 1.67 goals for Urawa Red Diamonds and 1.00 for Shonan Bellmare.
What was the final score of Urawa Red Diamonds vs Shonan Bellmare?
Urawa Red Diamonds 2-3 Shonan Bellmare in the Japan - J1 League on 06/07/2024. The analysis above shows what our model predicted before kick-off next to what actually happened.
What did the model predict for Urawa Red Diamonds vs Shonan Bellmare?
Before kick-off our model rated a Urawa Red Diamonds win the most likely single outcome at about 53%, with the full match-result split Urawa Red Diamonds 53%, draw 24%, Shonan Bellmare 23%. The final score 2-3 went against our main leads this time — single matches are noisy by nature; our accuracy is measured across thousands of predictions, not one result.